↓ Skip to main content

Psychological therapies for the management of chronic pain (excluding headache) in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
136 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
248 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Psychological therapies for the management of chronic pain (excluding headache) in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007407.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amanda C de C Williams, Emma Fisher, Leslie Hearn, Christopher Eccleston

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 136 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 248 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 2%
Ireland 2 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Unknown 240 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 42 17%
Student > Bachelor 41 17%
Researcher 33 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 10%
Other 21 8%
Other 47 19%
Unknown 38 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 80 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 62 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 10%
Neuroscience 8 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Other 17 7%
Unknown 52 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 116. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2020.
All research outputs
#195,449
of 16,650,301 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#404
of 11,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,483
of 304,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,650,301 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,558 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,951 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.