@ernestprakasa coba ini bang : 1. https://t.co/1SgizlEyRr 2. https://t.co/ja6NdPCFuJ 3. https://t.co/77087yjg9H
RT @spee_dentalblog: Saliva as a Candidate for COVID-19 Diagnostic Testing: A Meta-Analysis 8月のメタアナリシス COVID-19患者の唾液検査の感度は91%(CI 80-99%)、…
Saliva as a Candidate for COVID-19 Diagnostic Testing: A Meta-Analysis 8月のメタアナリシス COVID-19患者の唾液検査の感度は91%(CI 80-99%)、鼻咽頭スワブ(NPS)検査の感度は98%(CI 89-100%) 唾液検査は有用だが、感度の向上が必要 https://t.co/b7tTUUFvNh #COVID19dent
@fnyosv 70% sensitivitet för PCR på NPH tagen av sjukvårdspersonal kan väl inte stämma, den här meta-analysen anger sens på 98% https://t.co/3K2LHTSh62
RT @Samuel_Mondy: @cdne57 @philippefroguel @olivierveran @EmmanuelMacron bon avec une méta-analyse https://t.co/DufWoUN9SD, 91 vs 98% en se…
RT @COVID_Evidence: PubMed: Saliva as a Candidate for COVID-19 Diagnostic Testing: A Meta-Analysis: Background: COVID-19 is a serious and…
PubMed: Saliva as a Candidate for COVID-19 Diagnostic Testing: A Meta-Analysis: Background: COVID-19 is a serious and potentially deadly disease. Early diagnosis of infected individuals will play an important role in… https://t.co/etUxBgGRdw #covid19 #SAR
RT @Ruffino_Lorenzo: Come si capisce, per identificare correttamente i positivi al coronavirus è necessario che il test abbia un’alta sensi…
Come si capisce, per identificare correttamente i positivi al coronavirus è necessario che il test abbia un’alta sensibilità. Per quanto riguarda i tamponi nasofaringei/molecolari, Czumbel et al (2020) riporta una sensibilità del 98% (95%CI 89-100%). htt
@bholub @AlfredLRoca A little light reading. They are not worthless- but really are unproven in a RCT as to their value. There is a lot of room for operator error and I think we should just really be cautious. https://t.co/IdkV0THg43
RT @vi__enne: @Simonaguer @Ruffino_Lorenzo @OpencovidM @bicidiario @Doom3Gloom Per i tamponi nasofaringei/molecolari la sensitività riporta…
@Simonaguer @Ruffino_Lorenzo @OpencovidM @bicidiario @Doom3Gloom Per i tamponi nasofaringei/molecolari la sensitività riportata è del 98% (95%CI 89–100%) (sensitività = sensibilità = sensitivity) https://t.co/ozwuqVivhd https://t.co/SSt9UV3w2x
@drbigbeef @MichiganPodcast Myocartitis is sometimes life-long. Basic google search will show that. This study shows it at a 91% effective rate https://t.co/hdojaq45JG
RT @nutrepi: 📝唾液由来のPCR検査、有用かもね・・という話Czumbel et al., Front Med, 2020 https://t.co/Jn95J6NcEs 個人内変動が激しく 「イソジンとか使わないでね」 とか指針と遵守と面倒そう。 ・・どうでしょ…
📝唾液由来のPCR検査、有用かもね・・という話Czumbel et al., Front Med, 2020 https://t.co/Jn95J6NcEs 個人内変動が激しく 「イソジンとか使わないでね」 とか指針と遵守と面倒そう。 ・・どうでしょう?
RT @eSBNS: https://t.co/s30LVFpEyk This article conducted a meta-analysis of the consistency and reliability of saliva-based testing. They…
RT @nutrepi: @kame4477 @TeraGouki @Noboru_Hagino どうも有難うございます。JAMAでも紹介はあったものの不明瞭→新たな論文に至りました Discussionによると、無症状、健康な人に有用か否かは唾液由来のPCR(Evidence…
@kame4477 @TeraGouki @Noboru_Hagino どうも有難うございます。JAMAでも紹介はあったものの不明瞭→新たな論文に至りました Discussionによると、無症状、健康な人に有用か否かは唾液由来のPCR(Evidenceがなく)の有効性は不明とのことで・・(続 Saliva as a Candidate for ... A Meta-Analysis https://t.co/rpsvoCQCMh
RT @etxberria55: https://t.co/wZ8jrGWhaH(positive%20and,recruitment%20period%20(Figure%202A). This is a significant development in Covid…