↓ Skip to main content

How we teach children with asthma to use their inhaler: a scoping review protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How we teach children with asthma to use their inhaler: a scoping review protocol
Published in
Systematic Reviews, August 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13643-020-01430-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patrick McCrossan, Orla Mallon, Michael D. Shields, Dara O’Donoghue

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 18%
Librarian 2 12%
Student > Postgraduate 2 12%
Researcher 2 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 5 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 5 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 24%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 12%
Computer Science 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 3 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2020.
All research outputs
#5,868,276
of 23,230,825 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#996
of 2,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,246
of 398,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#36
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,230,825 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,017 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,755 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.