↓ Skip to main content

Long-term opioid management for chronic noncancer pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#19 of 11,327)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
32 news outlets
blogs
10 blogs
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
543 tweeters
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
2 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
469 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
408 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Long-term opioid management for chronic noncancer pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006605.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Meredith Noble, Jonathan R Treadwell, Stephen J Tregear, Vivian H Coates, Philip J Wiffen, Clarisse Akafomo, Karen M Schoelles, Roger Chou

Abstract

Opioid therapy for chronic noncancer pain (CNCP) is controversial due to concerns regarding long-term effectiveness and safety, particularly the risk of tolerance, dependence, or abuse.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 543 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 408 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 7 2%
United States 5 1%
Australia 2 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 390 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 56 14%
Student > Master 54 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 13%
Student > Bachelor 43 11%
Other 35 9%
Other 105 26%
Unknown 62 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 191 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 7%
Psychology 28 7%
Social Sciences 19 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 4%
Other 44 11%
Unknown 80 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 767. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2020.
All research outputs
#10,777
of 15,924,228 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#19
of 11,327 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39
of 130,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,924,228 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,327 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,316 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.