↓ Skip to main content

Use of Data-Biased Random Walks on Graphs for the Retrieval of Context-Specific Networks from Genomic Data

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
pinterest
1 Pinner

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Use of Data-Biased Random Walks on Graphs for the Retrieval of Context-Specific Networks from Genomic Data
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, August 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000889
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kakajan Komurov, Michael A. White, Prahlad T. Ram

Abstract

Extracting network-based functional relationships within genomic datasets is an important challenge in the computational analysis of large-scale data. Although many methods, both public and commercial, have been developed, the problem of identifying networks of interactions that are most relevant to the given input data still remains an open issue. Here, we have leveraged the method of random walks on graphs as a powerful platform for scoring network components based on simultaneous assessment of the experimental data as well as local network connectivity. Using this method, NetWalk, we can calculate distribution of Edge Flux values associated with each interaction in the network, which reflects the relevance of interactions based on the experimental data. We show that network-based analyses of genomic data are simpler and more accurate using NetWalk than with some of the currently employed methods. We also present NetWalk analysis of microarray gene expression data from MCF7 cells exposed to different doses of doxorubicin, which reveals a switch-like pattern in the p53 regulated network in cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. Our analyses demonstrate the use of NetWalk as a valuable tool in generating high-confidence hypotheses from high-content genomic data.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 8%
United Kingdom 4 4%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 97 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 34%
Researcher 33 29%
Student > Master 8 7%
Professor 8 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 4%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 6 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 35%
Computer Science 21 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 14%
Engineering 6 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 4%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 14 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2015.
All research outputs
#8,270,860
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#5,491
of 8,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,220
of 104,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#31
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,964 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,265 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.