You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Long term survival and local control outcomes from single dose targeted intraoperative radiotherapy during lumpectomy (TARGIT-IORT) for early breast cancer: TARGIT-A randomised clinical trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
British Medical Journal, August 2020
|
DOI | 10.1136/bmj.m2836 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jayant S Vaidya, Max Bulsara, Michael Baum, Frederik Wenz, Samuele Massarut, Steffi Pigorsch, Michael Alvarado, Michael Douek, Christobel Saunders, Henrik L Flyger, Wolfgang Eiermann, Chris Brew-Graves, Norman R Williams, Ingrid Potyka, Nicholas Roberts, Marcelle Bernstein, Douglas Brown, Elena Sperk, Siobhan Laws, Marc Sütterlin, Tammy Corica, Steinar Lundgren, Dennis Holmes, Lorenzo Vinante, Fernando Bozza, Montserrat Pazos, Magali Le Blanc-Onfroy, Günther Gruber, Wojciech Polkowski, Konstantin J Dedes, Marcus Niewald, Jens Blohmer, David McCready, Richard Hoefer, Pond Kelemen, Gloria Petralia, Mary Falzon, David J Joseph, Jeffrey S Tobias |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 275 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 50 | 18% |
United States | 46 | 17% |
Germany | 8 | 3% |
Dominican Republic | 7 | 3% |
Spain | 7 | 3% |
Canada | 5 | 2% |
Japan | 5 | 2% |
Italy | 5 | 2% |
Chile | 5 | 2% |
Other | 27 | 10% |
Unknown | 110 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 191 | 69% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 40 | 15% |
Scientists | 32 | 12% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 11 | 4% |
Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 192 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 192 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 16 | 8% |
Researcher | 14 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 14 | 7% |
Student > Master | 12 | 6% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 6% |
Other | 34 | 18% |
Unknown | 91 | 47% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 66 | 34% |
Physics and Astronomy | 7 | 4% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 2% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
Other | 19 | 10% |
Unknown | 91 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1053. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2023.
All research outputs
#15,140
of 25,758,211 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#378
of 65,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#685
of 427,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#22
of 754 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,211 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 65,033 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,460 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 754 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.