↓ Skip to main content

Wild bees and hoverflies respond differently to urbanisation, human population density and urban form

Overview of attention for article published in Landscape & Urban Planning, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#39 of 1,760)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
12 news outlets
twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Wild bees and hoverflies respond differently to urbanisation, human population density and urban form
Published in
Landscape & Urban Planning, December 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103901
Authors

Anna S. Persson, Johan Ekroos, Peter Olsson, Henrik G. Smith

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 75 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 19%
Student > Bachelor 14 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 16%
Researcher 5 7%
Professor 4 5%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 16 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 31%
Environmental Science 12 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Psychology 3 4%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 21 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 93. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2020.
All research outputs
#298,679
of 19,019,810 outputs
Outputs from Landscape & Urban Planning
#39
of 1,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,270
of 308,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Landscape & Urban Planning
#3
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,019,810 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,760 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,454 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.