↓ Skip to main content

The Invention of Madness: State, Society, and the Insane in Modern China Emily Baum Chicago, IL, and London: University of Chicago Press, 2018 ix + 267 pp. $37.50 ISBN 978-0-226-55824-0

Overview of attention for article published in China Quarterly, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Invention of Madness: State, Society, and the Insane in Modern China Emily Baum Chicago, IL, and London: University of Chicago Press, 2018 ix + 267 pp. $37.50 ISBN 978-0-226-55824-0
Published in
China Quarterly, August 2020
DOI 10.1017/s0305741020000843
Authors

Zhipeng Gao

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2020.
All research outputs
#2,168,910
of 16,354,101 outputs
Outputs from China Quarterly
#141
of 818 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,485
of 303,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age from China Quarterly
#5
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,354,101 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 818 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 303,638 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.