↓ Skip to main content

Gastrostomy insertion in the 21st century: PEG or laparoscopic? Report from a large single-centre series

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Surgery International, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gastrostomy insertion in the 21st century: PEG or laparoscopic? Report from a large single-centre series
Published in
Pediatric Surgery International, April 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00383-012-3079-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ruth Clare Wragg, Heidi Salminen, Max Pachl, Michael Singh, Anthony Lander, Ingo Jester, Dakshesh Parikh, Girish Jawaheer

Abstract

To determine whether laparoscopic-assisted gastrostomy (LAG) has superseded percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) based on the clinical outcomes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Norway 2 7%
Unknown 27 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 17%
Researcher 4 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Other 7 24%
Unknown 6 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 59%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 6 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2012.
All research outputs
#15,630,207
of 23,853,707 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Surgery International
#583
of 1,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,140
of 163,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Surgery International
#8
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,853,707 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,317 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,660 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.