You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effectiveness of switching between TNF inhibitors in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: is the reason to switch relevant?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Arthritis Research & Therapy, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13075-020-02288-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Santiago Rodrigues Manica, Alexandre Sepriano, Fernando Pimentel-Santos, Nélia Gouveia, Anabela Barcelos, Jaime C. Branco, Miguel Bernardes, Raquel Miriam Ferreira, Elsa Vieira-Sousa, Sofia Barreira, Filipe Vinagre, Raquel Roque, Helena Santos, Nathalie Madeira, João Rovisco, Alexandra Daniel, Sofia Ramiro |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 12% |
| Germany | 3 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 8% |
| Portugal | 2 | 8% |
| United States | 2 | 8% |
| Slovenia | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Bulgaria | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 8 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 60% |
| Scientists | 5 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 17% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 12 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 12 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2020.
All research outputs
#2,462,086
of 25,838,141 outputs
Outputs from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#444
of 3,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,864
of 426,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#4
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,838,141 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,416 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,637 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.