↓ Skip to main content

Cluster K Mycobacteriophages: Insights into the Evolutionary Origins of Mycobacteriophage TM4

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cluster K Mycobacteriophages: Insights into the Evolutionary Origins of Mycobacteriophage TM4
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0026750
Pubmed ID
Authors

Welkin H. Pope, Christina M. Ferreira, Deborah Jacobs-Sera, Robert C. Benjamin, Ariangela J. Davis, Randall J. DeJong, Sarah C. R. Elgin, Forrest R. Guilfoile, Mark H. Forsyth, Alexander D. Harris, Samuel E. Harvey, Lee E. Hughes, Peter M. Hynes, Arrykka S. Jackson, Marilyn D. Jalal, Elizabeth A. MacMurray, Coreen M. Manley, Molly J. McDonough, Jordan L. Mosier, Larissa J. Osterbann, Hannah S. Rabinowitz, Corwin N. Rhyan, Daniel A. Russell, Margaret S. Saha, Christopher D. Shaffer, Stephanie E. Simon, Erika F. Sims, Isabel G. Tovar, Emilie G. Weisser, John T. Wertz, Kathleen A. Weston-Hafer, Kurt E. Williamson, Bo Zhang, Steven G. Cresawn, Paras Jain, Mariana Piuri, William R. Jacobs, Roger W. Hendrix, Graham F. Hatfull

Abstract

Five newly isolated mycobacteriophages--Angelica, CrimD, Adephagia, Anaya, and Pixie--have similar genomic architectures to mycobacteriophage TM4, a previously characterized phage that is widely used in mycobacterial genetics. The nucleotide sequence similarities warrant grouping these into Cluster K, with subdivision into three subclusters: K1, K2, and K3. Although the overall genome architectures of these phages are similar, TM4 appears to have lost at least two segments of its genome, a central region containing the integration apparatus, and a segment at the right end. This suggests that TM4 is a recent derivative of a temperate parent, resolving a long-standing conundrum about its biology, in that it was reportedly recovered from a lysogenic strain of Mycobacterium avium, but it is not capable of forming lysogens in any mycobacterial host. Like TM4, all of the Cluster K phages infect both fast- and slow-growing mycobacteria, and all of them--with the exception of TM4--form stable lysogens in both Mycobacterium smegmatis and Mycobacterium tuberculosis; immunity assays show that all five of these phages share the same immune specificity. TM4 infects these lysogens suggesting that it was either derived from a heteroimmune temperate parent or that it has acquired a virulent phenotype. We have also characterized a widely-used conditionally replicating derivative of TM4 and identified mutations conferring the temperature-sensitive phenotype. All of the Cluster K phages contain a series of well conserved 13 bp repeats associated with the translation initiation sites of a subset of the genes; approximately one half of these contain an additional sequence feature composed of imperfectly conserved 17 bp inverted repeats separated by a variable spacer. The K1 phages integrate into the host tmRNA and the Cluster K phages represent potential new tools for the genetics of M. tuberculosis and related species.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 4%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 102 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 22%
Researcher 15 14%
Student > Bachelor 15 14%
Student > Master 8 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 7%
Other 19 18%
Unknown 19 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 46 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 16%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 7%
Chemistry 3 3%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 19 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2024.
All research outputs
#8,264,793
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#110,045
of 220,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,205
of 152,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,035
of 2,632 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 220,950 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 152,806 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,632 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.