You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of 309 Environmental Chemicals Using a Mouse Embryonic Stem Cell Adherent Cell Differentiation and Cytotoxicity Assay
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, June 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0018540 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kelly J. Chandler, Marianne Barrier, Susan Jeffay, Harriette P. Nichols, Nicole C. Kleinstreuer, Amar V. Singh, David M. Reif, Nisha S. Sipes, Richard S. Judson, David J. Dix, Robert Kavlock, Edward S. Hunter, Thomas B. Knudsen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 61 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 29% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 27% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 15% |
| Unknown | 6 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 29 | 44% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 14% |
| Unknown | 10 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2017.
All research outputs
#7,358,432
of 23,926,844 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#91,341
of 204,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,080
of 114,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#773
of 1,848 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,926,844 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 204,377 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,622 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,848 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.