↓ Skip to main content

Synthetic biology: from mainstream to counterculture

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Microbiology, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Synthetic biology: from mainstream to counterculture
Published in
Archives of Microbiology, June 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00203-016-1257-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roy D. Sleator

Abstract

Existing at the interface of science and engineering, synthetic biology represents a new and emerging field of mainstream biology. However, there also exists a counterculture of Do-It-Yourself biologists, citizen scientists, who have made significant inroads, particularly in the design and development of new tools and techniques. Herein, I review the development and convergence of synthetic biology's mainstream and countercultures.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
China 1 3%
Canada 1 3%
Unknown 34 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 19%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Student > Master 4 11%
Other 2 5%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 6 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 22%
Social Sciences 4 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 5%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 6 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2016.
All research outputs
#16,372,335
of 25,845,895 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Microbiology
#1,890
of 3,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#218,005
of 370,082 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Microbiology
#9
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,845,895 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,164 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,082 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.