↓ Skip to main content

Good News! Communication Findings May be Underestimated: Comparing Effect Sizes with Self-Reported and Logged Smartphone Use Data

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Good News! Communication Findings May be Underestimated: Comparing Effect Sizes with Self-Reported and Logged Smartphone Use Data
Published in
Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, August 2020
DOI 10.1093/jcmc/zmaa009
Authors

S Mo Jones-Jang, Yu-Jin Heo, Robert McKeever, Jung-Hyun Kim, Leigh Moscowitz, David Moscowitz

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 29%
Professor 3 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 3 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 11 52%
Computer Science 2 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Psychology 1 5%
Unspecified 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2020.
All research outputs
#2,236,114
of 17,383,690 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication
#204
of 583 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,199
of 305,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,383,690 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 583 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,505 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.