↓ Skip to main content

Intravenous immunoglobulin for presumed viral myocarditis in children and adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Intravenous immunoglobulin for presumed viral myocarditis in children and adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004370.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joan Robinson, Lisa Hartling, Ben Vandermeer, Meghan Sebastianski, Terry P Klassen

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 48 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 9 18%
Student > Postgraduate 6 12%
Student > Master 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 8%
Other 14 27%
Unknown 7 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 55%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 4%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 7 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2020.
All research outputs
#2,876,800
of 16,579,356 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,611
of 11,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,547
of 304,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#31
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,579,356 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,535 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,259 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.