| Title |
Sex differences in immune responses that underlie COVID-19 disease outcomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-020-2700-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Takehiro Takahashi, Mallory K. Ellingson, Patrick Wong, Benjamin Israelow, Carolina Lucas, Jon Klein, Julio Silva, Tianyang Mao, Ji Eun Oh, Maria Tokuyama, Peiwen Lu, Arvind Venkataraman, Annsea Park, Feimei Liu, Amit Meir, Jonathan Sun, Eric Y. Wang, Arnau Casanovas-Massana, Anne L. Wyllie, Chantal B. F. Vogels, Rebecca Earnest, Sarah Lapidus, Isabel M. Ott, Adam J. Moore, Albert Shaw, John B. Fournier, Camila D. Odio, Shelli Farhadian, Charles Dela Cruz, Nathan D. Grubaugh, Wade L. Schulz, Aaron M. Ring, Albert I. Ko, Saad B. Omer, Akiko Iwasaki |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,929 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 285 | 15% |
| Japan | 115 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 83 | 4% |
| Guatemala | 44 | 2% |
| Spain | 41 | 2% |
| Canada | 37 | 2% |
| Australia | 36 | 2% |
| India | 24 | 1% |
| Mexico | 21 | 1% |
| Other | 301 | 16% |
| Unknown | 942 | 49% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1411 | 73% |
| Scientists | 375 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 98 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 44 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1179 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 146 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 144 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 140 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 110 | 9% |
| Other | 66 | 6% |
| Other | 181 | 15% |
| Unknown | 392 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 188 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 158 | 13% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 120 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 69 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 38 | 3% |
| Other | 180 | 15% |
| Unknown | 426 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2648. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,818
of 25,791,495 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#294
of 98,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173
of 426,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#20
of 836 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,791,495 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,790 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,804 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 836 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.