You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Using paleo-archives to safeguard biodiversity under climate change
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1126/science.abc5654 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Damien A Fordham, Stephen T Jackson, Stuart C Brown, Brian Huntley, Barry W Brook, Dorthe Dahl-Jensen, M Thomas P Gilbert, Bette L Otto-Bliesner, Anders Svensson, Spyros Theodoridis, Janet M Wilmshurst, Jessie C Buettel, Elisabetta Canteri, Matthew McDowell, Ludovic Orlando, July A Pilowsky, Carsten Rahbek, David Nogues-Bravo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 351 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 29 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 18 | 5% |
| Denmark | 17 | 5% |
| Australia | 12 | 3% |
| France | 11 | 3% |
| India | 8 | 2% |
| Spain | 8 | 2% |
| Japan | 7 | 2% |
| Germany | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 84 | 24% |
| Unknown | 151 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 227 | 65% |
| Scientists | 109 | 31% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 11 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 275 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 275 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 50 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 48 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 8% |
| Professor | 17 | 6% |
| Other | 48 | 17% |
| Unknown | 63 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 54 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 53 | 19% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 41 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 28 | 10% |
| Unknown | 78 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 342. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2023.
All research outputs
#98,441
of 25,882,826 outputs
Outputs from Science
#3,267
of 83,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,175
of 427,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#118
of 1,004 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,882,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,402 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,243 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,004 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.