↓ Skip to main content

A Lack of Sexual Dimorphism in Width-to-Height Ratio in White European Faces Using 2D Photographs, 3D Scans, and Anthropometry

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Lack of Sexual Dimorphism in Width-to-Height Ratio in White European Faces Using 2D Photographs, 3D Scans, and Anthropometry
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0042705
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robin S. S. Kramer, Alex L. Jones, Robert Ward

Abstract

Facial width-to-height ratio has received a great deal of attention in recent research. Evidence from human skulls suggests that males have a larger relative facial width than females, and that this sexual dimorphism is an honest signal of masculinity, aggression, and related traits. However, evidence that this measure is sexually dimorphic in faces, rather than skulls, is surprisingly weak. We therefore investigated facial width-to-height ratio in three White European samples using three different methods of measurement: 2D photographs, 3D scans, and anthropometry. By measuring the same individuals with multiple methods, we demonstrated high agreement across all measures. However, we found no evidence of sexual dimorphism in the face. In our third study, we also found a link between facial width-to-height ratio and body mass index for both males and females, although this relationship did not account for the lack of dimorphism in our sample. While we showed sufficient power to detect differences between male and female width-to-height ratio, our results failed to support the general hypothesis of sexual dimorphism in the face.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Turkey 2 2%
Czechia 2 2%
Netherlands 1 1%
France 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Romania 1 1%
China 1 1%
Luxembourg 1 1%
Unknown 88 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 18%
Student > Bachelor 15 15%
Student > Master 14 14%
Student > Postgraduate 8 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 7%
Other 21 21%
Unknown 15 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 22%
Psychology 22 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 4%
Computer Science 4 4%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 17 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2022.
All research outputs
#2,552,912
of 24,903,209 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#31,572
of 215,803 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,084
of 174,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#502
of 4,136 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,903,209 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 215,803 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,124 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,136 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.