You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Employing Molecular Phylodynamic Methods to Identify and Forecast HIV Transmission Clusters in Public Health Settings: A Qualitative Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Viruses, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3390/v12090921 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shannan N. Rich, Veronica L. Richards, Carla N. Mavian, William M. Switzer, Brittany Rife Magalis, Karalee Poschman, Shana Geary, Steven E. Broadway, Spencer B. Bennett, Jason Blanton, Thomas Leitner, J. Lucas Boatwright, Nichole E. Stetten, Robert L. Cook, Emma C. Spencer, Marco Salemi, Mattia Prosperi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 17% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Researcher | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 22% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 11% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2024.
All research outputs
#3,710,699
of 25,834,578 outputs
Outputs from Viruses
#1,670
of 10,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,058
of 427,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Viruses
#57
of 329 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,834,578 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,834 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,165 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 329 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.