↓ Skip to main content

Nile Delta vegetation response to Holocene climate variability

Overview of attention for article published in Geology, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nile Delta vegetation response to Holocene climate variability
Published in
Geology, July 2012
DOI 10.1130/g33012.1
Authors

Christopher E. Bernhardt, Benjamin P. Horton, Jean-Daniel Stanley

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Panama 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Ireland 1 1%
France 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Unknown 77 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 22%
Researcher 15 17%
Student > Master 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 8%
Other 19 22%
Unknown 9 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 43 50%
Environmental Science 13 15%
Arts and Humanities 8 9%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 11 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2016.
All research outputs
#1,106,284
of 17,347,018 outputs
Outputs from Geology
#988
of 3,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,537
of 137,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geology
#15
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,347,018 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,711 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 137,532 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.