↓ Skip to main content

Nutritional interventions for liver‐transplanted patients

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
211 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nutritional interventions for liver‐transplanted patients
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007605.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gero Langer, Katja Großmann, Steffen Fleischer, Almuth Berg, Dirk Grothues, Andreas Wienke, Johann Behrens, Astrid Fink

Abstract

Malnutrition is a common problem for patients waiting for orthotopic liver transplantation and a risk factor for post-transplant morbidity. The decision to initiate enteral or parenteral nutrition, to which patients and at which time, is still debated. The effects of nutritional supplements given before or after liver transplantation, or both, still remains unclear.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 211 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 205 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 32 15%
Student > Master 24 11%
Researcher 21 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 8%
Student > Postgraduate 14 7%
Other 35 17%
Unknown 68 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 13%
Psychology 9 4%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Other 17 8%
Unknown 77 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2017.
All research outputs
#16,106,935
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,216
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,360
of 186,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#171
of 209 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,217 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 209 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.