↓ Skip to main content

Nutritional interventions for liver-transplanted patients

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nutritional interventions for liver-transplanted patients
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007605.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gero Langer, Katja Großmann, Steffen Fleischer, Almuth Berg, Dirk Grothues, Andreas Wienke, Johann Behrens, Astrid Fink

Abstract

Malnutrition is a common problem for patients waiting for orthotopic liver transplantation and a risk factor for post-transplant morbidity. The decision to initiate enteral or parenteral nutrition, to which patients and at which time, is still debated. The effects of nutritional supplements given before or after liver transplantation, or both, still remains unclear.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
South Africa 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 125 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 27 20%
Student > Master 17 13%
Researcher 17 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 9%
Student > Postgraduate 10 8%
Other 28 21%
Unknown 21 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 15%
Social Sciences 7 5%
Psychology 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 28 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2017.
All research outputs
#6,656,879
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,977
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,509
of 123,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#75
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,903 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.