↓ Skip to main content

Nutritional support for acute kidney injury

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nutritional support for acute kidney injury
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005426.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yi Li, Xi Tang, Juqian Zhang, Taixiang Wu

Abstract

Treatment for acute kidney Injury (AKI) primarily relies on treating the underlying cause and maintaining the patient until kidney function has recovered. Enteral and parenteral nutrition are commonly used to treat nutritional disorders in AKI patients, however their efficacy in treating AKI are still debated. This review was first published in 2010.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 113 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 21%
Student > Master 20 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 10%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Other 9 8%
Other 28 24%
Unknown 12 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 60 51%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 5%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 18 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2019.
All research outputs
#2,197,512
of 15,153,847 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,802
of 11,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,084
of 131,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#41
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,153,847 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,123 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,170 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.