↓ Skip to main content

Reconstruction method and optimum range of camera-shooting angle for 3D plant modeling using a multi-camera photography system

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Methods, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reconstruction method and optimum range of camera-shooting angle for 3D plant modeling using a multi-camera photography system
Published in
Plant Methods, August 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13007-020-00658-6
Authors

Xingtong Lu, Eiichi Ono, Shan Lu, Yu Zhang, Poching Teng, Mitsuko Aono, Yo Shimizu, Fumiki Hosoi, Kenji Omasa

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 17%
Other 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Professor 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 9 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 17%
Engineering 3 17%
Environmental Science 1 6%
Design 1 6%
Unknown 10 56%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2020.
All research outputs
#11,456,503
of 18,810,040 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#575
of 894 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,856
of 310,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,810,040 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 894 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,210 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them