↓ Skip to main content

Spontaneous echo contrast, left atrial appendage thrombus and stroke in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Overview of attention for article published in EuroIntervention, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
56 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Spontaneous echo contrast, left atrial appendage thrombus and stroke in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
Published in
EuroIntervention, January 2021
DOI 10.4244/eij-d-20-00743
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthias Linder, Lisa Voigtländer, Yvonne Schneeberger, Oliver Daniel Bhadra, David Grundmann, Till Demal, Alina Goßling, Sebastian Ludwig, Andreas Schaefer, Lara Waldschmidt, Johannes Schirmer, Hermann Reichenspurner, Stefan Blankenberg, Ulrich Schäfer, Dirk Westermann, Niklas Schofer, Lenard Conradi, Moritz Seiffert

Abstract

The relevance of spontaneous echo contrast (SEC) and left atrial appendage thrombus (LAAT) in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remains unclear. We assessed the prevalence of SEC and LAAT and evaluated the impact on periprocedural outcome after TAVI. A total of 2,549 consecutive patients underwent TAVI between 2008 and 2017. After exclusion of cases with insufficient imaging, concomitant procedures or severe intraprocedural complications, 1,558 cases were analysed. Three groups were defined according to (pre)thrombotic formations: moderate or severe SEC (n=89), LAAT (n=53), and reference (n=1416). The primary outcome was disabling ischemic stroke within 24 hours. The prevalence was4.4% for LAAT and 5.4% for moderate/severe SEC. The primary outcome occurred more frequently in patients with moderate/severe SEC (6.8%) compared to reference (2.1%) and LAAT (1.9%) groups (p=0.020). SEC was identified as an independent risk factor for the primary outcome (OR 3.54 [95%CI 1.30-9.61]; p=0.013). LAAT was associated with an impaired unadjusted 1-year survival (43.4%) compared to SEC (27.3%) and reference groups (18.7%; p<0.001). SEC and LAAT were detected in a relevant number of patients undergoing TAVI. SEC may represent an important risk factor for intraprocedural stroke and increased mortality was observed in patients with LAAT.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 56 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 23%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 15%
Student > Master 1 8%
Unknown 7 54%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 54%
Unknown 6 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,172,062
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from EuroIntervention
#315
of 2,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,117
of 519,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EuroIntervention
#21
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,572 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 519,474 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.