You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Glass Shape Influences Consumption Rate for Alcoholic Beverages
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0043007 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Angela S. Attwood, Nicholas E. Scott-Samuel, George Stothart, Marcus R. Munafò |
| Abstract |
High levels of alcohol consumption and increases in heavy episodic drinking (binge drinking) are a growing public concern, due to their association with increased risk of personal and societal harm. Alcohol consumption has been shown to be sensitive to factors such as price and availability. The aim of this study was to explore the influence of glass shape on the rate of consumption of alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverages. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 368 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 60 | 16% |
| Japan | 44 | 12% |
| United States | 30 | 8% |
| Canada | 8 | 2% |
| Spain | 8 | 2% |
| Denmark | 5 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 4 | 1% |
| Australia | 4 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 30 | 8% |
| Unknown | 172 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 309 | 84% |
| Scientists | 36 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 14 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 9 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 3% |
| Unknown | 155 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 45 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 17% |
| Other | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 38 | 22% |
| Unknown | 18 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 40 | 23% |
| Psychology | 34 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 38 | 22% |
| Unknown | 26 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 490. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2024.
All research outputs
#55,037
of 25,888,065 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#937
of 225,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195
of 188,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#9
of 4,213 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,888,065 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,815 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,027 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,213 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.