↓ Skip to main content

Editors’ Introduction

Overview of attention for article published in Oral History Review, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#10 of 242)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
33 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Editors’ Introduction
Published in
Oral History Review, September 2020
DOI 10.1080/00940798.2020.1792197
Authors

David Caruso, Abigail Perkiss, Janneken Smucker

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 1 50%
Researcher 1 50%
Student > Master 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 1 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 50%
Social Sciences 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2020.
All research outputs
#867,865
of 17,483,393 outputs
Outputs from Oral History Review
#10
of 242 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,936
of 306,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oral History Review
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,483,393 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 242 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,897 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them