↓ Skip to main content

Determining the Determinants: Factors of Change in China's South China Sea Strategy, 1995–2015*

Overview of attention for article published in Pacific Focus, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Determining the Determinants: Factors of Change in China's South China Sea Strategy, 1995–2015*
Published in
Pacific Focus, August 2020
DOI 10.1111/pafo.12167
Authors

Yves‐Heng Lim, Jiye Kim

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2020.
All research outputs
#4,680,414
of 16,348,801 outputs
Outputs from Pacific Focus
#10
of 65 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,087
of 305,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pacific Focus
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,348,801 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 65 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them