↓ Skip to main content

Correlation Between DNase I Hypersensitive Site Distribution and Gene Expression in HeLa S3 Cells

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
6 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Correlation Between DNase I Hypersensitive Site Distribution and Gene Expression in HeLa S3 Cells
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0042414
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ya-Mei Wang, Ping Zhou, Li-Yong Wang, Zhen-Hua Li, Yao-Nan Zhang, Yu-Xiang Zhang

Abstract

Mapping DNase I hypersensitive sites (DHSs) within nuclear chromatin is a traditional and powerful method of identifying genetic regulatory elements. DHSs have been mapped by capturing the ends of long DNase I-cut fragments (>100,000 bp), or 100-1200 bp DNase I-double cleavage fragments (also called double-hit fragments). But next generation sequencing requires a DNA library containing DNA fragments of 100-500 bp. Therefore, we used short DNA fragments released by DNase I digestion to generate DNA libraries for next generation sequencing. The short segments are 100-300 bp and can be directly cloned and used for high-throughput sequencing. We identified 83,897 DHSs in 2,343,479 tags across the human genome. Our results indicate that the DHSs identified by this DHS assay are consistent with those identified by longer fragments in previous studies. We also found: (1) the distribution of DHSs in promoter and other gene regions of similarly expressed genes differs among different chromosomes; (2) silenced genes had a more open chromatin structure than previously thought; (3) DHSs in 3'untranslated regions (3'UTRs) are negatively correlated with level of gene expression.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Italy 2 2%
Germany 2 2%
Turkey 1 <1%
Unknown 101 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 27%
Student > Master 23 21%
Researcher 16 15%
Student > Bachelor 15 14%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 13 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 20%
Engineering 5 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 4%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 16 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2023.
All research outputs
#3,098,891
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#40,730
of 193,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,662
of 167,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#695
of 4,162 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,562 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,363 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,162 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.