↓ Skip to main content

Should Physical Activity Be Considered Essential During the COVID-19 Pandemic?

Overview of attention for article published in "International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences", June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
Should Physical Activity Be Considered Essential During the COVID-19 Pandemic?
Published in
"International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences", June 2020
DOI 10.36660/ijcs.20200072
Authors

Francisco José Gondim Pitanga, Carmem Cristina Beck, Cristiano Penas Seara Pitanga

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 17%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Researcher 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 19 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 11 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 7%
Neuroscience 3 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 21 46%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2020.
All research outputs
#12,366,653
of 18,810,040 outputs
Outputs from "International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences"
#56
of 121 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,063
of 310,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age from "International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences"
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,810,040 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 121 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,098 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.