↓ Skip to main content

K-ATP channels in dopamine substantia nigra neurons control bursting and novelty-induced exploration

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Neuroscience, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
180 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
306 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
K-ATP channels in dopamine substantia nigra neurons control bursting and novelty-induced exploration
Published in
Nature Neuroscience, August 2012
DOI 10.1038/nn.3185
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julia Schiemann, Falk Schlaudraff, Verena Klose, Markus Bingmer, Susumu Seino, Peter J Magill, Kareem A Zaghloul, Gaby Schneider, Birgit Liss, Jochen Roeper

Abstract

Phasic activation of the dopamine (DA) midbrain system in response to unexpected reward or novelty is critical for adaptive behavioral strategies. This activation of DA midbrain neurons occurs via a synaptically triggered switch from low-frequency background spiking to transient high-frequency burst firing. We found that, in medial DA neurons of the substantia nigra (SN), activity of ATP-sensitive potassium (K-ATP) channels enabled NMDA-mediated bursting in vitro as well as spontaneous in vivo burst firing in anesthetized mice. Cell-selective silencing of K-ATP channel activity in medial SN DA neurons revealed that their K-ATP channel-gated burst firing was crucial for novelty-dependent exploratory behavior. We also detected a transcriptional upregulation of K-ATP channel and NMDA receptor subunits, as well as high in vivo burst firing, in surviving SN DA neurons from Parkinson's disease patients, suggesting that burst-gating K-ATP channel function in DA neurons affects phenotypes in both disease and health.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 306 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 4 1%
Germany 4 1%
United States 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 5 2%
Unknown 281 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 80 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 68 22%
Student > Master 29 9%
Student > Bachelor 21 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 16 5%
Other 54 18%
Unknown 38 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 110 36%
Neuroscience 79 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 34 11%
Psychology 9 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 3%
Other 21 7%
Unknown 45 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2012.
All research outputs
#17,664,478
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from Nature Neuroscience
#5,022
of 5,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,086
of 169,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Neuroscience
#69
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,209 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 52.9. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,237 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.