↓ Skip to main content

Electronic Government

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Electronic Government'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 The Current State of Research on eGovernment in Developing Countries: A Literature Review
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Electronic Government
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 On the Interaction of Source and Channel Choice in the Government-to-Business Context
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Building Understanding of Smart City Initiatives
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 The Need to Adjust Lean to the Public Sector
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 ‘Demand Driven Development of Public e-Services’
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Improving PA Business Processes through Modeling, Analysis, and Reengineering
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Issues and Guiding Principles for Opening Governmental Judicial Research Data
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 "5 Days in August" – How London Local Authorities Used Twitter during the 2011 Riots
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Shared Services in Irish Local Government
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Information Technology and the Efficiency of the Brazilian Judiciary System
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Electronic Government
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Cross-Border Legal Identity Management
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Understanding Enterprise Architecture: Perceptions by the Finnish Public Sector
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 The Understanding of ICTs in Public Sector and Its Impact on Governance
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Investigating Outcomes of T-Government Using a Public Value Management Approach
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 E-government in Tanzania: Current Status and Future Challenges
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 A Model to Assess Open Government Data in Public Agencies
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Comparing Private and Public Sector on Information Systems Development and Maintenance Efficiency
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Analysis of the Methodologies for Evaluation of E-Government Policies
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Assessing Effects of eGovernment Initiatives Based on a Public Value Framework
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Citizens’ Attitudes towards Electronic Identification in a Public E-Service Context – An Essential Perspective in the eID Development Process
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 A Framework for Evaluating Citizens’ Expectations and Satisfaction toward Continued Intention to Use E-Government Services
Attention for Chapter 9: "5 Days in August" – How London Local Authorities Used Twitter during the 2011 Riots
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
226 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
"5 Days in August" – How London Local Authorities Used Twitter during the 2011 Riots
Chapter number 9
Book title
Electronic Government
Published in
Lecture notes in computer science, January 2012
DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-33489-4_9
Book ISBNs
978-3-64-233488-7, 978-3-64-233489-4
Authors

Panagiotopoulos, Panagiotis, Ziaee Bigdeli, Alinaghi, Sams, Steven, Panagiotis Panagiotopoulos, Alinaghi Ziaee Bigdeli, Steven Sams

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 226 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 2 <1%
Finland 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 215 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 23%
Student > Doctoral Student 32 14%
Student > Master 29 13%
Researcher 20 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 17 8%
Other 42 19%
Unknown 34 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 63 28%
Social Sciences 50 22%
Business, Management and Accounting 41 18%
Decision Sciences 6 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 2%
Other 16 7%
Unknown 45 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2012.
All research outputs
#7,336,077
of 23,305,591 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#2,387
of 8,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,573
of 246,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#141
of 491 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,305,591 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,162 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,589 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 491 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.