You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Role of Systematic Reviews and the Campbell Collaboration in the Realization of Evidence-Informed Practice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Social Work Journal, December 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10615-010-0307-0 |
| Authors |
Aron Shlonsky, Eamonn Noonan, Julia H. Littell, Paul Montgomery |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 41 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 25% |
| Researcher | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
| Professor | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 30% |
| Unknown | 6 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 16 | 36% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 16% |
| Psychology | 6 | 14% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 5% |
| Engineering | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 6 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2012.
All research outputs
#14,605,487
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Social Work Journal
#330
of 1,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,960
of 179,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Social Work Journal
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,110 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,749 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.