↓ Skip to main content

A Novel Volume-Age-KPS (VAK) Glioblastoma Classification Identifies a Prognostic Cognate microRNA-Gene Signature

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
2 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Novel Volume-Age-KPS (VAK) Glioblastoma Classification Identifies a Prognostic Cognate microRNA-Gene Signature
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0041522
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pascal O. Zinn, Pratheesh Sathyan, Bhanu Mahajan, John Bruyere, Monika Hegi, Sadhan Majumder, Rivka R. Colen

Abstract

Several studies have established Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) prognostic and predictive models based on age and Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), while very few studies evaluated the prognostic and predictive significance of preoperative MR-imaging. However, to date, there is no simple preoperative GBM classification that also correlates with a highly prognostic genomic signature. Thus, we present for the first time a biologically relevant, and clinically applicable tumor Volume, patient Age, and KPS (VAK) GBM classification that can easily and non-invasively be determined upon patient admission.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Korea, Republic of 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 81 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 15%
Student > Master 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 8%
Other 21 24%
Unknown 12 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 41%
Computer Science 6 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 7%
Engineering 5 6%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 17 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2022.
All research outputs
#4,075,044
of 23,053,169 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#59,160
of 196,586 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,218
of 165,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#845
of 4,048 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,053,169 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 196,586 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,396 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,048 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.