You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How publishing in open access journals threatens science and what we can do about it
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Wildlife Management, June 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1002/jwmg.21111 |
| Authors |
H. Charles Romesburg |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 103 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 18 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 16 | 16% |
| Canada | 9 | 9% |
| Australia | 4 | 4% |
| Germany | 3 | 3% |
| Italy | 3 | 3% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 36 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 56 | 54% |
| Scientists | 35 | 34% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 8 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Latvia | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 104 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 24 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 18% |
| Researcher | 15 | 13% |
| Librarian | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 26 | 23% |
| Unknown | 13 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 44 | 38% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 10% |
| Environmental Science | 11 | 10% |
| Psychology | 8 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 12% |
| Unknown | 20 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 79. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2019.
All research outputs
#552,671
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Wildlife Management
#45
of 2,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,946
of 375,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Wildlife Management
#1
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,780 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 375,349 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.