You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Impact of Tricuspid Regurgitation on Clinical Outcomes The COAPT Trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
JACC, September 2020
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.07.035 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Rebecca T Hahn, Federico Asch, Neil J Weissman, Paul Grayburn, Saibal Kar, Scott Lim, Ori Ben-Yehuda, Bahira Shahim, Shmuel Chen, Mengdan Liu, Bjorn Redfors, Diego Medvedofsky, Rishi Puri, Samir Kapadia, Anna Sannino, JoAnn Lindenfeld, William T Abraham, Michael J Mack, Gregg W Stone |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 88 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 16 | 18% |
Spain | 7 | 8% |
Germany | 6 | 7% |
Argentina | 4 | 5% |
Brazil | 3 | 3% |
Mexico | 3 | 3% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
Saudi Arabia | 3 | 3% |
Colombia | 2 | 2% |
Other | 14 | 16% |
Unknown | 27 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 51 | 58% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 21 | 24% |
Scientists | 10 | 11% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 104 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 14 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
Other | 6 | 6% |
Other | 19 | 18% |
Unknown | 41 | 39% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 44 | 42% |
Unspecified | 3 | 3% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
Psychology | 2 | 2% |
Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
Other | 4 | 4% |
Unknown | 46 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2020.
All research outputs
#794,944
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#1,996
of 16,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,149
of 424,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#60
of 219 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,743 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,805 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 219 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.