You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare
|
---|---|
Published in |
Simulation in Healthcare, October 2012
|
DOI | 10.1097/sih.0b013e3182620228 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Marisa Brett-Fleegler, Jenny Rudolph, Walter Eppich, Michael Monuteaux, Eric Fleegler, Adam Cheng, Robert Simon |
Abstract |
This study examined the reliability of the scores of an assessment instrument, the Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare (DASH), in evaluating the quality of health care simulation debriefings. The secondary objective was to evaluate whether the instrument's scores demonstrate evidence of validity. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
Netherlands | 1 | 33% |
Australia | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 2 | 67% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 304 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 2 | <1% |
Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
Ireland | 1 | <1% |
Austria | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 296 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 35 | 12% |
Researcher | 32 | 11% |
Other | 30 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 24 | 8% |
Other | 81 | 27% |
Unknown | 73 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 119 | 39% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 52 | 17% |
Social Sciences | 17 | 6% |
Psychology | 9 | 3% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | <1% |
Other | 16 | 5% |
Unknown | 88 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2022.
All research outputs
#16,046,765
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Simulation in Healthcare
#609
of 1,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,486
of 190,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Simulation in Healthcare
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,129 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,989 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.