↓ Skip to main content

Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare

Overview of attention for article published in Simulation in Healthcare, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
114 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare
Published in
Simulation in Healthcare, October 2012
DOI 10.1097/sih.0b013e3182620228
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marisa Brett-Fleegler, Jenny Rudolph, Walter Eppich, Michael Monuteaux, Eric Fleegler, Adam Cheng, Robert Simon

Abstract

This study examined the reliability of the scores of an assessment instrument, the Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare (DASH), in evaluating the quality of health care simulation debriefings. The secondary objective was to evaluate whether the instrument's scores demonstrate evidence of validity.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
Ireland 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 124 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 13%
Other 17 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 17 13%
Student > Master 15 11%
Other 48 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 53%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 14%
Social Sciences 15 11%
Unspecified 12 9%
Psychology 7 5%
Other 10 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2012.
All research outputs
#7,850,160
of 12,511,243 outputs
Outputs from Simulation in Healthcare
#428
of 735 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,917
of 124,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Simulation in Healthcare
#12
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,511,243 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 735 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,151 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.