↓ Skip to main content

Valuing the ecosystem service benefits from kelp forest restoration: A choice experiment from Norway

Overview of attention for article published in Ecological Economics, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Valuing the ecosystem service benefits from kelp forest restoration: A choice experiment from Norway
Published in
Ecological Economics, January 2021
DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106833
Authors

Stephen Hynes, Wenting Chen, Kofi Vondolia, Claire Armstrong, Eamonn O'Connor

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 102 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 19%
Student > Master 13 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 10%
Other 6 6%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 29 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 21 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 17%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 16 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 37 36%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2021.
All research outputs
#2,805,314
of 18,217,940 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Economics
#804
of 3,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,293
of 310,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Economics
#17
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,217,940 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,492 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,196 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.