↓ Skip to main content

Alerta à comunidade fonoaudiológica brasileira sobre a importância da atuação científica e clínica na afasia progressiva primária

Overview of attention for article published in CoDAS, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Alerta à comunidade fonoaudiológica brasileira sobre a importância da atuação científica e clínica na afasia progressiva primária
Published in
CoDAS, October 2015
DOI 10.1590/2317-1782/20152015081
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bárbara Costa Beber, Lenisa Brandão, Márcia Lorena Fagundes Chaves

Abstract

This article aims to warn the Brazilian Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology scientific community about the importance and necessity of scientific and clinical activities regarding Primary Progressive Aphasia. This warning is based on a systematic literature review of the scientific production on Primary Progressive Aphasia, from which nine Brazilian articles were selected. It was observed that there is an obvious lack of studies on the subject, as all the retrieved articles were published in medical journals and much of it consisted of small samples; only two articles described the effectiveness of speech-language therapy in patients with Primary Progressive Aphasia. A perspective for the future in the area and characteristics of Speech-Language Therapy for Primary Progressive Aphasia are discussed. As a conclusion, it is evident the need for greater action by Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology on Primary Progressive Aphasia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 111 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 28 25%
Student > Master 10 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 5%
Researcher 4 4%
Student > Postgraduate 3 3%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 54 49%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 41 37%
Neuroscience 4 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 55 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2016.
All research outputs
#17,729,864
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from CoDAS
#1
of 5 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,312
of 288,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CoDAS
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.4. This one scored the same or higher as 4 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,034 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them