↓ Skip to main content

Consequences of information suppression in ecological and conservation sciences

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Letters, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#18 of 997)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
19 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
269 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
3 Redditors
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Consequences of information suppression in ecological and conservation sciences
Published in
Conservation Letters, September 2020
DOI 10.1111/conl.12757
Authors

Don A. Driscoll, Georgia E. Garrard, Alexander M. Kusmanoff, Stephen Dovers, Martine Maron, Noel Preece, Robert L. Pressey, Euan G. Ritchie

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 269 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 66 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 29%
Student > Master 9 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 12%
Other 4 6%
Professor 4 6%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 12 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 21%
Environmental Science 12 18%
Social Sciences 11 17%
Computer Science 3 5%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 18 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 332. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2022.
All research outputs
#80,305
of 22,579,714 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#18
of 997 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,637
of 322,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,579,714 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 997 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 50.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,510 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.