Transient Smartphone “Blindness”

Overview of attention for article published in New England Journal of Medicine, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#7 of 19,078)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
240 news outlets
blogs
14 blogs
twitter
590 tweeters
facebook
46 Facebook pages
googleplus
7 Google+ users

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Transient Smartphone “Blindness”
Published in
New England Journal of Medicine, June 2016
DOI 10.1056/nejmc1514294
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alim-Marvasti, Ali, Bi, Wei, Mahroo, Omar A, Barbur, John L, Plant, Gordon T, Alim-Marvasti, A., Mahroo, Omar A., Barbur, John L., Plant, Gordon T.

Abstract

Two patients presented with loss of vision after viewing a smartphone screen in bed in the dark. The cause appeared to be differential bleaching of photopigment, with one eye becoming light-adapted while the other eye (blocked by a pillow) became dark-adapted.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 590 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 8%
Japan 1 4%
Unknown 21 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 5 21%
Professor 4 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 13%
Researcher 3 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Other 7 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 71%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 8%
Computer Science 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2427. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2017.
All research outputs
#138
of 7,595,602 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#7
of 19,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8
of 259,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#1
of 296 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 7,595,602 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,078 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,224 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 296 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.