↓ Skip to main content

Treatment and prevention of pouchitis after ileal pouch‐anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
167 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Treatment and prevention of pouchitis after ileal pouch‐anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001176.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nghia Nguyen, Bing Zhang, Stefan D Holubar, Darrell S Pardi, Siddharth Singh

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 167 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 29 17%
Researcher 16 10%
Student > Master 16 10%
Other 14 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 6%
Other 15 9%
Unknown 67 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 25%
Psychology 11 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Other 23 14%
Unknown 75 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2023.
All research outputs
#17,861,983
of 26,163,973 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,664
of 13,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#306,314
of 483,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#170
of 184 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,163,973 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 483,516 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 184 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.