RT @WesPegden: The CDC did the same study in 2020, and found a near-perfect lack of correlation, and they buried the results in a table the…
RT @AWokeZombie: Wes and Ben bring up some key points to today's terrible MMWR about the gimmick of masks. Its so bad the authors have sh…
RT @WesPegden: The CDC did the same study in 2020, and found a near-perfect lack of correlation, and they buried the results in a table the…
RT @WesPegden: The CDC did the same study in 2020, and found a near-perfect lack of correlation, and they buried the results in a table the…
RT @AWokeZombie: Wes and Ben bring up some key points to today's terrible MMWR about the gimmick of masks. Its so bad the authors have sh…
@BretWeinstein
RT @WesPegden: The CDC did the same study in 2020, and found a near-perfect lack of correlation, and they buried the results in a table the…
RT @WesPegden: The CDC did the same study in 2020, and found a near-perfect lack of correlation, and they buried the results in a table the…
@EmigrantPanama v nj jdou prikladem a deckam lepi rousky paskou k obliceji pritom uz v roce 2020 zjistilo, ze rousky nemaji prakticky zadny vyznam, ale zazdilo to (viz konec tabulky). https://t.co/XVYVMnS29O https://t.co/qJxzvpgnFg
RT @WesPegden: The CDC did the same study in 2020, and found a near-perfect lack of correlation, and they buried the results in a table the…
RT @WesPegden: The CDC did the same study in 2020, and found a near-perfect lack of correlation, and they buried the results in a table the…
RT @WesPegden: The CDC did the same study in 2020, and found a near-perfect lack of correlation, and they buried the results in a table the…
RT @AWokeZombie: Wes and Ben bring up some key points to today's terrible MMWR about the gimmick of masks. Its so bad the authors have sh…
RT @WesPegden: The CDC did the same study in 2020, and found a near-perfect lack of correlation, and they buried the results in a table the…
RT @WesPegden: The CDC did the same study in 2020, and found a near-perfect lack of correlation, and they buried the results in a table the…
RT @WesPegden: The CDC did the same study in 2020, and found a near-perfect lack of correlation, and they buried the results in a table the…
RT @WesPegden: The CDC did the same study in 2020, and found a near-perfect lack of correlation, and they buried the results in a table the…
RT @AWokeZombie: Wes and Ben bring up some key points to today's terrible MMWR about the gimmick of masks. Its so bad the authors have sh…
RT @WesPegden: The CDC did the same study in 2020, and found a near-perfect lack of correlation, and they buried the results in a table the…
RT @WesPegden: The CDC did the same study in 2020, and found a near-perfect lack of correlation, and they buried the results in a table the…
RT @AWokeZombie: Wes and Ben bring up some key points to today's terrible MMWR about the gimmick of masks. Its so bad the authors have sh…
RT @WesPegden: The CDC did the same study in 2020, and found a near-perfect lack of correlation, and they buried the results in a table the…
RT @WesPegden: The CDC did the same study in 2020, and found a near-perfect lack of correlation, and they buried the results in a table the…
RT @WesPegden: The CDC did the same study in 2020, and found a near-perfect lack of correlation, and they buried the results in a table the…
RT @WesPegden: The CDC did the same study in 2020, and found a near-perfect lack of correlation, and they buried the results in a table the…
RT @WesPegden: The CDC did the same study in 2020, and found a near-perfect lack of correlation, and they buried the results in a table the…
RT @AWokeZombie: Wes and Ben bring up some key points to today's terrible MMWR about the gimmick of masks. Its so bad the authors have sh…
RT @WesPegden: The CDC did the same study in 2020, and found a near-perfect lack of correlation, and they buried the results in a table the…
RT @AWokeZombie: Wes and Ben bring up some key points to today's terrible MMWR about the gimmick of masks. Its so bad the authors have sh…
RT @WesPegden: The CDC did the same study in 2020, and found a near-perfect lack of correlation, and they buried the results in a table the…
RT @AWokeZombie: Wes and Ben bring up some key points to today's terrible MMWR about the gimmick of masks. Its so bad the authors have sh…
RT @WesPegden: The CDC did the same study in 2020, and found a near-perfect lack of correlation, and they buried the results in a table the…
RT @WesPegden: The CDC did the same study in 2020, and found a near-perfect lack of correlation, and they buried the results in a table the…
RT @AWokeZombie: Wes and Ben bring up some key points to today's terrible MMWR about the gimmick of masks. Its so bad the authors have sh…
Wes and Ben bring up some key points to today's terrible MMWR about the gimmick of masks. Its so bad the authors have shutdown their replies in their marketing tweets of it.
@meganranney < cough cough >
RT @WesPegden: The CDC did the same study in 2020, and found a near-perfect lack of correlation, and they buried the results in a table the…
RT @WesPegden: The CDC did the same study in 2020, and found a near-perfect lack of correlation, and they buried the results in a table the…
RT @WesPegden: The CDC did the same study in 2020, and found a near-perfect lack of correlation, and they buried the results in a table the…
RT @WesPegden: The CDC did the same study in 2020, and found a near-perfect lack of correlation, and they buried the results in a table the…
The CDC did the same study in 2020, and found a near-perfect lack of correlation, and they buried the results in a table they ignored in the actual text of this MMWR: https://t.co/S6h8Ho8dtT I wonder how many times they've done it since then before getting
@CDCgov WRONG!!!! 85% of infected people wore a mask as opposed to 4% who never wore one says the CDC!!! https://t.co/lIhu4XuYOk
@TomFitton @MailOnline Wearing masks increase infection rate 22X!!! 84% of infected people wore masks v 4% of people who never wore one. #Science https://t.co/lIhu4XuYOk
@TheEliKlein Tch tch...nice straw man. Of course, people are eating in restaurants - the CDC has identified it as a high-risk behavior. https://t.co/LdeFAE5F9V No, what I am saying is you urge high-risk behaviors for others. Over and over. So, let's s
https://t.co/DssAIrQVnS LIKE FOR REAL WHEN ARE WE GOING TO MOVE FORWARD INDOOR AIR QUALITY MATTERS CLEAN AIR ACT REGULATE INDOOR AIR QUALITY EVERY SECTOR CONGREGATE SETTINGS SCHOOLS AND HOSPITALS AND LTC AND SHELTERS RESTAURANTS AND RETAIL FACTORY & T
@Anaya877 @KCRG Unfortunately this study has some issues for example: "can last up to 72 hours on plastic" Covid on Sufaces: https://t.co/4DoJlk9MKo 70.6% of respondents in this study masked and got Covid: https://t.co/m7ELkAbrjp Also anecdotally google:
@ncman424 @Jusrangers First up, a JULY 2020 piece: https://t.co/mcoBL7t42W Note that it’s about people who went to restaurants/bars and… didn’t wear masks there. Surprise! Golly, seems like the people compiling it aren’t anti-mask. (What a shocker.) 2/ ht
@GI_JEDi YES! 22X more likely. 85% of mask wearers to 4% of non mask wearers. https://t.co/lIhu4XuYOk
"Eating and drinking on-site at locations that offer such options might be important risk factors associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection." https://t.co/V10wkQufPo
@Piiirlouit @Schreuer @chrisdefraigne @UniversiteLiege un exemple d'un compte utilisant cette interprétation erronée (pas pour l'afficher en particulier, la plupart relayaient le message de la même manière à l'époque) : https://t.co/tWL3Rzem0M
@BuckSexton @Bob_INFJ Why do mask mandates always predate a surge? #MasksDontWork Because they cause infection by a factor of 22 as opposed to not wearing one. https://t.co/lIhu4XuYOk
@JdmMeuse Masks actually increase the infection rate by a factor of 22. https://t.co/MKTtPfsvuI
@TheFirstonTV The #Science is clear on this. Wearing a mask increases your chances of infection by a factor of 22. 85% of mask wearers were infected as opposed to 4% on non-mask wearers. https://t.co/lIhu4XuYOk
Thanks!
@MalcolmRoberts5 @DFisman @March4Wildlife Might be this? https://t.co/N3M5nenUAE
@Rebecca33B @reopenbucks @pahealthsec I’ve read studies that show masking reduces #COVID transmission. @CDCgov did a study evaluating risk by activities early in #Pandemic https://t.co/OX9zaQZyMq
Restaurant dining has been proven to cause a 3-4 fold increase in risk of contracting covid. Please don’t take epidemiology advice from those who don’t follow the science. This is the same person who said that Toronto was too uptight about the pandemic htt
@NoLore Riiiiight. “Adults with positive SARS-CoV-2 test results were approximately twice as likely to have reported dining at a restaurant than were those with negative SARS-CoV-2 test results.” https://t.co/ioGij6z0OG
@mrsmaris I was referring to the first tweet…that putting the onus for control of an epidemic on individuals and their choices is bound to fail. As you note, indoor restaurant dining has been associated with a 3-4 fold increase in risk. Thank you for thi
RT @PCribbett: @Midnight1121 @MaryamHenein I located that study and downloaded the pdf. The study supports the use of masks. Inter alia, i…
@KarolPrillwitz @jarek_gadek @IgorKowalik00 @el_albertoo @MZ_GOV_PL No więc lecimy po kolei. Pierwsze badanie nie dotyczy transmisji. Ponaadto jest dużo niżej w EBM niż nowe RCT, które przytoczyłem. https://t.co/iAcWnF3nsu
@queens_parents @salad_is_delish @deepcuts1984 @MaudMaron News article is entirely based on this CDC study. What was the recommendation? "Universal and correct mask use is still recommended by CDC for adults and children in schools regardless of vaccinat
@markogabor88 @Gaaxlord Természetesen a maszkra is van :D Méghozzá a CDC-tol, tehát elég megbízható forrásból. Azt senki nem vitatja, hogy klinikai körülmények között jól teljesít. De a hétköznapokban nem mutatható ki szignifikáns különbség a hordas és a n
RT @JamesTodaroMD: Let’s be clear, the CDC report showed no benefit for masks in its case control study. The case and control groups had n…
@BrianLenzkes July 2020 https://t.co/jOVTeePjfp
@ChevyriderTalnt @KTVU "Adults with positive SARS-CoV-2 test results were approximately twice as likely to have reported dining at a restaurant than were those with negative SARS-CoV-2 test results." https://t.co/xTU7gRYXNn
@CDCDirector @HHSGov The CDC's own study, which apparently you have not been briefed on, clearly shows that masks increase infection rate by a factor of 22! https://t.co/lIhu4XuYOk
@klaaargh A maszkra pedig ennyire szamits: Az amerikai CDC kutatása szerint: a pozitív COVID-19 teszttel rendelkezők túlnyomó többsége (70,6%) mindig, 14,4% pedig gyakran használt maszkot (ez együtt 85%), mégis tünetes COVID betegek lettek. https://t.co/T
RT @menschmodus: 🤭 CDC study show 85% of Covid cases were people who Often or Always wear masks. https://t.co/wLK8nn7RaA #MaskUp #maskeauf…
🤭 CDC study show 85% of Covid cases were people who Often or Always wear masks. https://t.co/wLK8nn7RaA #MaskUp #maskeauf https://t.co/or6hgLdzft
@benwillbond This CDC study, kept very quiet, shows that people who wear masks are 21X more likely to get infected. 84% of infected people wore masks 4% never wore a mask. https://t.co/lIhu4XuYOk
@AKNewsNow Source: https://t.co/ohx2SL9lzK
@grillmasterac @Torsk19 @nypost Damn, again you missed half the info. Here it is, you’re welcome. https://t.co/NSDcu1Iylr
RT @10DMark: @TristanSchind11 @Kelly93820237 Wer schaut sich den ellenlange Dokumente von links an ? Ok, weil sie es sind: https://t.co/g…
@TristanSchind11 @Kelly93820237 Wer schaut sich den ellenlange Dokumente von links an ? Ok, weil sie es sind: https://t.co/glyEoAkLTN
@Chrisgreymatter @denkgebot @AussieVal10 @badvaers @BadVaccineTakes There's no scientific evidence that deaths are reduced by wearing masks. CDC data says you're more likely to test positive if you wear a mask. This makes sense as you re-inhale expelled b
@AGJ59 @RealMarkLatham There's no scientific evidence that deaths are reduced by wearing masks. CDC data says you're more likely to test positive if you wear a mask. This makes sense as you re-inhale expelled bacteria/viruses. 85% of infected people alw
@tedbrassfield @lilyxbtc @naval The Freedom Land health thing https://t.co/fkq9gaPh6A
@GrumpyOleDave @chickybabe_71 @UnitedAusParty There's no scientific evidence that deaths are reduced by wearing masks. CDC data says you're more likely to test positive if you wear a mask. This makes sense as you re-inhale expelled bacteria/viruses. 85%
@iamjasonbailey You can find lots of stuff on the CDC's website. Like this study that shows you are 22X more likely to get infected by wearing a mask! https://t.co/AOiZHi4hPd
RT @BorisuJohnson2: 식당, 술집, 카페, 헬스장, 교회 등 음식물을 섭취하거나 장시간 머무르고 대인접촉이 많은 장소에서 감염확률이 증가한다는 얘기는 나온지 1년도 더됐고 그간의 방역정책은 이러한 보고들을 근간으로 하고있음. 이제 와서…
RT @BorisuJohnson2: 식당, 술집, 카페, 헬스장, 교회 등 음식물을 섭취하거나 장시간 머무르고 대인접촉이 많은 장소에서 감염확률이 증가한다는 얘기는 나온지 1년도 더됐고 그간의 방역정책은 이러한 보고들을 근간으로 하고있음. 이제 와서…
RT @BorisuJohnson2: 식당, 술집, 카페, 헬스장, 교회 등 음식물을 섭취하거나 장시간 머무르고 대인접촉이 많은 장소에서 감염확률이 증가한다는 얘기는 나온지 1년도 더됐고 그간의 방역정책은 이러한 보고들을 근간으로 하고있음. 이제 와서…
RT @ChartskyTrades: Apparently . . . According to the https://t.co/AUnQyIwW2F site itself . . . 85% of those who contracted COVID in the st…
RT @BorisuJohnson2: 식당, 술집, 카페, 헬스장, 교회 등 음식물을 섭취하거나 장시간 머무르고 대인접촉이 많은 장소에서 감염확률이 증가한다는 얘기는 나온지 1년도 더됐고 그간의 방역정책은 이러한 보고들을 근간으로 하고있음. 이제 와서…
RT @BorisuJohnson2: 식당, 술집, 카페, 헬스장, 교회 등 음식물을 섭취하거나 장시간 머무르고 대인접촉이 많은 장소에서 감염확률이 증가한다는 얘기는 나온지 1년도 더됐고 그간의 방역정책은 이러한 보고들을 근간으로 하고있음. 이제 와서…
RT @BorisuJohnson2: 식당, 술집, 카페, 헬스장, 교회 등 음식물을 섭취하거나 장시간 머무르고 대인접촉이 많은 장소에서 감염확률이 증가한다는 얘기는 나온지 1년도 더됐고 그간의 방역정책은 이러한 보고들을 근간으로 하고있음. 이제 와서…
RT @BorisuJohnson2: 식당, 술집, 카페, 헬스장, 교회 등 음식물을 섭취하거나 장시간 머무르고 대인접촉이 많은 장소에서 감염확률이 증가한다는 얘기는 나온지 1년도 더됐고 그간의 방역정책은 이러한 보고들을 근간으로 하고있음. 이제 와서…
RT @BorisuJohnson2: 식당, 술집, 카페, 헬스장, 교회 등 음식물을 섭취하거나 장시간 머무르고 대인접촉이 많은 장소에서 감염확률이 증가한다는 얘기는 나온지 1년도 더됐고 그간의 방역정책은 이러한 보고들을 근간으로 하고있음. 이제 와서…