You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
日本の古い酒造りをもとめて
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF BREWING,JAPAN, November 2011
|
| DOI | 10.6013/jbrewsocjapan1915.59.136 |
| Authors |
金井 春吉, 坂口 謹一郎, 篠田 統, 鈴木 明治 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2020.
All research outputs
#8,122,542
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF BREWING,JAPAN
#62
of 323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,301
of 154,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF BREWING,JAPAN
#22
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 323 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,737 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.