You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Fair publication of qualitative research in health systems: a call by health policy and systems researchers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal for Equity in Health, June 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12939-016-0368-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Social science approaches for research and engagement in health policy & systems (SHaPeS) thematic working group of Health Systems Global, Regional Network for Equity in Health in East and Southern Africa (EQUINET), and Emerging Voices for Global Health, Karen Daniels, Rene Loewenson, Asha George, Natasha Howard, Gergana Koleva, Simon Lewin, Bruno Marchal, Devaki Nambiar, Ligia Paina, Emma Sacks, Kabir Sheikh, Moses Tetui, Sally Theobald, Stephanie M. Topp, Anthony B. Zwi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 177 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 21 | 12% |
| United States | 13 | 7% |
| Canada | 12 | 7% |
| South Africa | 9 | 5% |
| Australia | 8 | 5% |
| Spain | 4 | 2% |
| India | 3 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 3 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 21 | 12% |
| Unknown | 81 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 92 | 52% |
| Scientists | 58 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 21 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Uganda | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 174 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 63 | 36% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 14% |
| Researcher | 15 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 27 | 15% |
| Unknown | 29 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 50 | 28% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 28 | 16% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 3% |
| Psychology | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 22 | 12% |
| Unknown | 34 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 115. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2018.
All research outputs
#373,452
of 25,766,791 outputs
Outputs from International Journal for Equity in Health
#22
of 2,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,408
of 369,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal for Equity in Health
#1
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,766,791 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,264 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,877 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.