↓ Skip to main content

Two Cases of Successful Treatment With Hachimijiogan for Irregular Menstruation

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Nutrition, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Two Cases of Successful Treatment With Hachimijiogan for Irregular Menstruation
Published in
Frontiers in Nutrition, September 2020
DOI 10.3389/fnut.2020.00146
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tatsuji Hirabayashi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 20%
Student > Bachelor 1 20%
Other 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 2 40%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2020.
All research outputs
#20,642,821
of 23,237,082 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#3,752
of 4,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#343,117
of 400,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#83
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,237,082 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,860 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,973 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.