The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 145 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Microbe-host interactions: Influence of the gut microbiota on the enteric nervous system
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Developmental Biology, June 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ydbio.2016.06.027 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Niall P. Hyland, John F. Cryan |
| Abstract |
The enteric nervous system (ENS), considered a separate branch of the autonomic nervous system, is located throughout the length of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract as a series of interconnected ganglionated plexi. Given the proximity of the intestinal microbiota to the ENS, it is perhaps not surprising that the gut microbiota can influence its development and function. However, these interactions are complex and may be either direct or indirect, often involving signalling initiated by microbe-derived components, metabolites or host-derived intermediaries which subsequently affect enteric nerve excitability and GI function. Individual microbes and strains can differentially influence ENS activity and neurochemistry. In this review we will briefly summarise the role of the microbiota on ENS development, and, in some more detail, explore the mechanisms by which the microbiota can influence ENS activity and function. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 22 | 15% |
| Australia | 6 | 4% |
| Canada | 6 | 4% |
| Italy | 3 | 2% |
| France | 3 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Germany | 3 | 2% |
| Spain | 3 | 2% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Unknown | 85 | 59% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 96 | 66% |
| Scientists | 29 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 16 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 261 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 257 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 42 | 16% |
| Researcher | 36 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 34 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 7% |
| Other | 35 | 13% |
| Unknown | 65 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 42 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 33 | 13% |
| Neuroscience | 23 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 21 | 8% |
| Other | 31 | 12% |
| Unknown | 74 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 95. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2020.
All research outputs
#472,731
of 26,368,738 outputs
Outputs from Developmental Biology
#14
of 5,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,102
of 371,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Developmental Biology
#1
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,368,738 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,652 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,966 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.