You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Potential Geographic Distribution of Brown Marmorated Stink Bug Invasion (Halyomorpha halys)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, February 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0031246 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gengping Zhu, Wenjun Bu, Yubao Gao, Guoqing Liu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 267 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 1% |
| Unknown | 249 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 51 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 46 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 6% |
| Other | 38 | 14% |
| Unknown | 55 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 143 | 54% |
| Environmental Science | 32 | 12% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 2% |
| Engineering | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 13 | 5% |
| Unknown | 63 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2017.
All research outputs
#1,966,279
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#23,854
of 225,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,900
of 173,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#334
of 3,560 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,267 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,560 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.