@shrewddudescast @jvipondmd https://t.co/hm98kFT37c https://t.co/oanwOaqoEy https://t.co/tY8u9AXBXK I'm sure you will find reasons to dismiss these, there are plenty more. There are no easy answers, but I think you are more opposed to being told what to do
@drclairetaylor @SMooreesq 2nd one used contact tracing to guess source of transmission then called people weeks later and asked if they recalled being masked when around that person. Do the other 4 get better? https://t.co/qOTrjaX8Xc
@rusinopp @vivifranmiyu https://t.co/tIxSP83mFR 過去に厚労省が出したマスク有効の根拠とされるもの。 一番上:いわゆる東大マネキン実験。in vitro 2番目:いわゆる富岳シミュレーション。in silico 下3つ:観察研究。 https://t.co/5ngQaN8eVI 有効と言うに決定打と言える論文はない。弱すぎだ。
@GeoFreC @JamesMelville https://t.co/VvpYqtV10T Retroactive case study with survey as data collection (people have terrible memories), excluded people who were positive with index cases. "% of missing values for the variable indicating whether the index pa
@ToriToribio @scipio91 @noaylucky @Carlis02Jc @bastadementirya @luisete @Reisdeg @jmanuel_santos @ituerahipster @RubenDa789655 @Edgarcialonso @nachor81 @CarlosRMA94 @Broderil @javichu73 Has pasado encuestitas telefónicas chinas. https://t.co/kPgQKV4s18
@ToriToribio @bastadementirya @noaylucky @Carlis02Jc @scipio91 @luisete @Reisdeg @jmanuel_santos @ituerahipster @RubenDa789655 @Edgarcialonso @nachor81 @CarlosRMA94 @Broderil @javichu73 ¿Pero cómo que no son encuestas?!?! https://t.co/kPgQKV4s18
@ToriToribio @noaylucky @Carlis02Jc @bastadementirya @scipio91 @luisete @Reisdeg @jmanuel_santos @ituerahipster @RubenDa789655 @Edgarcialonso @nachor81 @CarlosRMA94 @Broderil @javichu73 Jajaja, espera, que creo que no has leído todos los tuits con los que
@bastadementirya @ToriToribio @scipio91 @luisete @Reisdeg @jmanuel_santos @Carlis02Jc @ituerahipster @noaylucky @RubenDa789655 @Edgarcialonso @nachor81 @CarlosRMA94 @Broderil @javichu73 Pues sólo hay que entrar al segundo estudio, el de Doung- Ngern. Efect
@KaatjeKip2022 @JoepBC @natuurweblog @ashatenbroeke @hansvantelling die van de mondkap ook, zul je bedoelen. Behoorlijk goed zelfs. Om tal van bewijzen te geven, 7 studies: https://t.co/1y0tMWfRHb https://t.co/y7BPoIHCWx https://t.co/mGnfcxj6et https://t.c
@Wnn1a51 @MiyuMotohashi 有効側 一番有名なのが https://t.co/4fYeJ9aEFg バングラデシュRCT https://t.co/EQfIjFvak8 厚労省資料から https://t.co/XtabqTp1Je https://t.co/lu5okCFO3v https://t.co/8ifcmviuU7 あたり。
@nn_565656 @revenge22323898 しかも、上記資料を調べたら北京とタイの著者が逆。杜撰すぎ。 北京:Wang et al.では? https://t.co/XtabqTp1Je タイ:Doung-Ngern et al.では? https://t.co/lu5okCFO3v 米空母:Payne et al. https://t.co/8ifcmviuU7
RT @EgonOlsen_: @PokeyArcticCirc @chris_artisan @tine_pe @calvinius1980 @derliebeMichi @ZDFheute Hier ein paar der Studien, die zeigen, das…
@PokeyArcticCirc @chris_artisan @tine_pe @calvinius1980 @derliebeMichi @ZDFheute Hier ein paar der Studien, die zeigen, dass Masken schützen https://t.co/EdgWNYVm2J https://t.co/lzXBJ4cFKs https://t.co/gwxTkeKzqK https://t.co/kdt0t4MEk6 https://t.co/lDiHz
@TastyGahagafaga @arnschm @ZDFheute ermöglichen, als wenn ich Ihnen jetzt irgendwelche Beispielstudien raussuchen würde wie z.B. https://t.co/JMif8uwb3u https://t.co/rHtf0XDv9Y https://t.co/3gx4M7VjPE https://t.co/RwjvAzzOU4 https://t.co/GjT246NMvD https:
@jamario3 @Dr2NisreenAlwan 2. https://t.co/JeCEqnEfkk "those who wore masks more often were also more likely to practice social distancing and hand washing". It's not clear which of these variables are responsible for the difference it finds, which for mas
@vaporbytes @hippyhappycata JAJAJAJAJAJA, ya sé que no pones enlaces porque te da vergüenza compartir la basura que compartes, pero córtate un poco y deja de hacer el ridículo, que me estás intentando desmontar meta-análisis de RCTs con ENCUESTAS TELÉFONIC
@Marisazayas1 @Mj06470761 @EntreprisasC @penacuntin Con sólo seis estudios, sólo hay uno que no sea en personal sanitario (imagen 1) y el que no es en personal sanitario, aunque imagino que los de sanitarios también lo serán, es UNA ENCUESTA TELEFÓNICA (im
RT @ivaningrad: @Placeb0Mad @bastadementirya @Edgarcialonso @elpuntualizador @vgomaria @Mirasa1974 Pero va y responde con lo único que tien…
@Placeb0Mad @bastadementirya @Edgarcialonso @elpuntualizador @vgomaria @Mirasa1974 Pero va y responde con lo único que tienen los creyentes del amuleto para defenderlo, que es una encuesta teléfonica: https://t.co/xnJJ5ZZGyg https://t.co/zjANzrqlMA
@marilusegunch @jalguater @AdaaLovelacee Única referencia fuera de personal sanitario, cómo no, la misma encuesta telefónica de antes: https://t.co/xnJJ5ZZGyg https://t.co/r7dXTAPzAz
@marilusegunch @jalguater @AdaaLovelacee Es que siempre igual, RCTs contra encuestitas telefónicas. https://t.co/fx7B1RXQ1S https://t.co/5ETQxQis2c
@rebelpeach1 @mediumeli @theoleary @paul_bryant @carahB1 @PaulGBrandon @jasmith_yorku 1) It is supported by data. https://t.co/Sxoj5ek2uf https://t.co/v3nw1c253R https://t.co/TrI3AnfgY2 https://t.co/MN9n7x81N0 2) Data showing that masks aren't effective ag
@Jenna_bee__ @AlanSim34718124 Yes. This is shown in study after study after study. https://t.co/Sxoj5ek2uf https://t.co/v3nw1c253R https://t.co/TrI3AnfgY2 https://t.co/3UmRgwRx8T
@apt12sydney @markmar43049153 @newscomauHQ I picked these ones. https://t.co/ov6P3BbXmR You can't address them.
@thelukass71 @ReubenR80027912 @luckytran compared with each other. Here are the 6 studies that are included in the qualitative synthesis for mask-wearing (figure 5) https://t.co/oUCOGjDCp1 https://t.co/yRo5MjrRTf https://t.co/Yhfk1WrTax https://t.co/QgoF6
RT @Just_Why23: @alkcheet @cricketwyvern @MattPachent @NicolaSturgeon Here' s an article discussing studies carried out on the effectivenes…
@alkcheet @cricketwyvern @MattPachent @NicolaSturgeon Here' s an article discussing studies carried out on the effectiveness of mask wearing: https://t.co/tkxmYP1woI And here are two of the papers cited in that article: https://t.co/DhNybx7Rrk https://t.co
@paulf774 @cricketwyvern @MattPachent @NicolaSturgeon There are 11 studies on the effects of mask wearing cited in the table in the article. No links, but all you need to do is Google them. Here are two of the studies cited: https://t.co/wj0l6N8cAY https:/
@CheshireSkitz @luckytran How so? Studies show that masks are effective at reducing spread. https://t.co/Sxoj5ek2uf https://t.co/v3nw1c253R https://t.co/TrI3AnfgY2 https://t.co/3UmRgwRx8T
@RealCanuckLib @BreannaPhipps12 There are many many studies that show masks DO have a benefit. https://t.co/Sxoj5ek2uf https://t.co/v3nw1c253R https://t.co/TrI3AnfgY2 https://t.co/3UmRgwRx8T
@TheRawSpeak Masks do work. This is shown in study after study after study. https://t.co/Sxoj5e2Zsf https://t.co/v3nw1bL21R https://t.co/TrI3Anxqca https://t.co/3UmRgx9Gn1
@SnippityPakin @thealexfreed @AConcernedPare2 @graciefacelove Can you provide any of this overwhelming evidence? Here's some studies showing that mask usage prevents spread: https://t.co/Sxoj5e2rCH https://t.co/v3nw1bKucj https://t.co/TrI3AnwSmC https://t
@Freerider4Pow @c0nc0rdance Let's take 1 at a time. Here's a list of studies supporting masks mitigating community spread, which I posted in response to others. https://t.co/EJXAZHZoXr Also, you're conflating aerosols with water droplets, not quite the sa
@helper409 @CureLiberalism1 @c0nc0rdance Well, provide your evidence then. Here's 11 studies supporting the claim that masks mitigate community spread: 1. https://t.co/wXnDoVEKwj 2. https://t.co/JakKO9EHKw 3. https://t.co/8vyXEwmGFe 4. https://t.co/ZcffVjA
@grave_acid @thatsnotmine125 maybe this? https://t.co/47YtGUu03a
@pablogonzalezt @FelipeMiguelBA Yo no soy nadie para "explicar". Solo confío más en aportes científicos que en políticos que acomodan las medidas sanitarias a las encuestas. https://t.co/ptqdkuAchi https://t.co/n7uTFVkstC https://t.co/DDDdDzwfsz https://t
@shikigamild @ALittleTweet @ianmSC You claimed the WHO says there is a lack of evidence. You were wrong. There is evidence which the WHO cites: [34] https://t.co/UWOVBLNj5e [35] https://t.co/7q4jwFCF9M [36] https://t.co/3UIVYFfLQ8 (You're also wrong to i
@glenraphael @TannedBeach @CalebQuestion @ScottAdamsSays Incorrect on 1 and 3 measuring conscientiousness. Studies with analysis based on contact tracing and asking people who were previously in contact with COVID patients whether the source was masking is
RT @benswart: How about in Thailand. Where track and trace found, from 1,000 interviews, wearing masks reduced the risk of transmission by…
How about in Thailand. Where track and trace found, from 1,000 interviews, wearing masks reduced the risk of transmission by 70% https://t.co/KvTG5ROqgJ
RT @bencowling88: (7/34) ... complement other public health measures. The 10% to 20% estimate was from a review of randomized trials agains…
RT @bencowling88: (7/34) ... complement other public health measures. The 10% to 20% estimate was from a review of randomized trials agains…
RT @bencowling88: (7/34) ... complement other public health measures. The 10% to 20% estimate was from a review of randomized trials agains…
RT @bencowling88: (7/34) ... complement other public health measures. The 10% to 20% estimate was from a review of randomized trials agains…
RT @bencowling88: (7/34) ... complement other public health measures. The 10% to 20% estimate was from a review of randomized trials agains…
(15/34) Second study by Doung-Ngern et al. is a case-control study analysing data on 1050 contacts traced in Thailand https://t.co/KtkKItcJkc
(7/34) ... complement other public health measures. The 10% to 20% estimate was from a review of randomized trials against influenza (with likely similar modes of transmission) and most of those trials were done in households rather than general community
Bundagaard: https://t.co/Acv7BZXKdV Doung-Ngern: https://t.co/ihT3520995 Krishnamachari: https://t.co/J0ZkBsb1s9 Lio: https://t.co/9SQ08wzaWm Xu: https://t.co/YW54OPEECc Wang: https://t.co/UFS0FsNJOd https://t.co/XNIxFrcXzD
This study actually makes my point about co-factors : "...contacts who always wore masks were more likely to practice social distancing" A retrospective telephone survey, horrific to hold up as conclusive of anything https://t.co/7LZ3IkTvAZ
go through each one with v brief summary. I've provided the link to the paper in each case so you can judge for yourselves. 2) Doung-Ngern (https://t.co/QPLAMnaiQH) the subjects in this study weren't a random selection of the population but found through c
@mroliverbarnes Dig into that Doung-Ngern study (which skews the value of masking compared to the Danmask study) and you'll see that it is of really really low quality. https://t.co/vC9bM3c1u4 https://t.co/gJyGDMgUua
@cshperspectives I'm all for meta-analyses, but you have to be careful with the studies you select. Not a lot of confidence in this study, 583 could not be reached. https://t.co/vC9bM3c1u4 https://t.co/J7bHPSDk0t