↓ Skip to main content

Systemic treatments for eczema: a network meta‐analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
34 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
276 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Systemic treatments for eczema: a network meta‐analysis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013206.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ratree Sawangjit, Piyameth Dilokthornsakul, Antonia Lloyd-Lavery, Nai Ming Lai, Robert Dellavalle, Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 276 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 276 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 13%
Student > Bachelor 31 11%
Other 18 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 4%
Other 47 17%
Unknown 119 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 71 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 6%
Unspecified 10 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 3%
Other 39 14%
Unknown 124 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,174,146
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,358
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,224
of 429,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#44
of 171 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,134 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 171 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.