↓ Skip to main content

Systemic treatments for eczema: a network meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
26 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Systemic treatments for eczema: a network meta-analysis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013206.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ratree Sawangjit, Piyameth Dilokthornsakul, Antonia Lloyd-Lavery, Nai Ming Lai, Robert Dellavalle, Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2020.
All research outputs
#1,304,321
of 15,921,538 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,465
of 11,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,449
of 210,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#13
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,921,538 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,326 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,696 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.